Wikipedia:Copyright problems/Without online source
Suspected copyright infringements without online source
These need a thorough check for online sources, and if none are found, a check for offline sources.
- I'm not sure about these, but they're awfully suspect. Ahmad ibn Tulun (history · last edit) and Mosque of Amr (history · last edit). Both by the same author. Both had "By A.I MAKKI" at the top of the article. I was unable to locate online sources for either of these articles, but searching for "By A.I MAKKI" returns a ton of hits, such as [1] and [2], suggesting that the legitimate author is a writer somewhere, and that these works are copied. I didn't place the copyvio notice on the pages since I can't find a source, but if anyone else is able to come up with anything, feel free to add the notice. —Brim
- Asteroid M. All this user's other articles were direct lifts from other sites (listed in Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2005_November_16), but he hasn't given a source for this one. No reason to think it's not another lift from somewhere though. - SoM 14:04, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- Culture History of the San Francisco Bay and the Central Coast - obvious copy and paste, but I can't find the source online. -- Kjkolb 06:53, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
- BPI History. The source given on the copyvio page, which I've left as I found it, is not the source for the text. However, the text certainly seems to be be a copyvio. Chick Bowen 22:44, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
- Dhole (Cthulhu mythos) (history · last edit) Possible copyvio from print source. See Talk:Dhole (Cthulhu mythos) for details. -- Writtenonsand 03:44, 7 February 2006 (UTC)