Hadamard's maximal determinant problem
Hadamard's maximal determinant problem, named after Jacques Hadamard, asks for the largest possible determinant of a matrix with elements restricted to the set {1,−1}. The question for matrices with elements restricted to the set {0,1} is equivalent: the maximal determinant of a {1,−1} matrix of size n is 2n−1 times the maximal determinant of a {0,1} matrix of size n−1. The problem was first posed by Jacques Hadamard in the 1893 paper [1] in which he presented his famous determinant bound, but the problem remains unsolved for matrices of general size. Hadamard's bound implies that {1, −1}-matrices of size n have determinant at most nn/2. Matrices whose determinants attain the bound are now known as Hadamard matrices, although examples had earlier been found by Sylvester.[2] Any two rows of an n×n Hadamard matrix are orthogonal, which is impossible for a {1, −1} matrix when n is an odd number. When n ≡ 2 (mod 4), two rows that are both orthogonal to a third row cannot be orthogonal to each other. Together, these statements imply that an n×n Hadamard matrix can exist only if n = 1, 2, or a multiple of 4. Hadamard matrices have been well studied, but it is not known whether a Hadamard matrix of size 4k exists for every k ≥ 1. The smallest n for which an n×n Hadamard matrix is not known to exist is 668.
Matrix sizes n for which n ≡ 1, 2, or 3 (mod 4) have received less attention. Nevertheless, some results are known, including:
- tighter bounds for n ≡ 1, 2, or 3 (mod 4) (These bounds, due to Barba, Ehlich, and Wojtas, are known not to be always attainable.),
- a few infinite sequences of matrices attaining the bounds for n ≡ 1 or 2 (mod 4),
- a number of matrices attaining the bounds for specific n ≡ 1 or 2 (mod 4),
- a number of matrices not attaining the bounds for specific n ≡ 1 or 3 (mod 4), but that have been proved by exhaustive computation to have maximal determinant.
The maximal determinant is known up to n = 18. In the following table, D(n) represents the maximal determinant divided by 2n−1.
n | D(n) | Notes |
---|---|---|
1 | 1 | Hadamard matrix |
2 | 1 | Hadamard matrix |
3 | 1 | Attains Ehlich bound |
4 | 2 | Hadamard matrix |
5 | 3 | Attains Barba bound; circulant matrix |
6 | 5 | Attains Ehlich–Wojtas bound |
7 | 9 | 98.20% of Ehlich bound |
8 | 32 | Hadamard matrix |
9 | 56 | 84.89% of Barba bound |
10 | 144 | Attains Ehlich–Wojtas bound |
11 | 320 | 94.49% of Ehlich bound; three non-equivalent matrices |
12 | 1458 | Hadamard matrix |
13 | 3645 | Attains Barba bound; maximal-determinant matrix is {1,−1} incidence matrix of projective plane of order 3 |
14 | 9477 | Attains Ehlich–Wojtas bound |
15 | 25515 | 97.07% of Ehlich bound |
16 | 131072 | Hadamard matrix; five non-equivalent matrices |
17 | 327680 | 87.04% of Barba bound; three non-equivalent matrices |
18 | 1114112 | Attains Ehlich–Wojtas bound; three non-equivalent matrices |
The design of experiments in statistics makes use of {1, −1} matrices X (not necessarily square) for which the information matrix XTX has maximal determinant. (The notation XT denotes the transpose of X.) Such matrices are known as D-optimal designs.[3] If X is a square matrix, it is known as a saturated D-optimal design.
References
- ^ Hadamard, J. (1893), "Résolution d'une question relative aux déterminants", Bulletin des Sciences Mathématiques, 17: 240–246
- ^ Sylvester, J. J. (1867), "Thoughts on inverse orthogonal matrices, simultaneous sign successions, and tesselated pavements in two or more colours, with applications to Newton's rule, ornamental tile-work, and the theory of numbers", London Edinburgh and Dublin Philos. Mag. and J. Sci., 34: 461–475
- ^ Galil, Z.; Kiefer, J. (1980), "D-optimum weighing designs", Ann. Statist., 8: 1293–1306