Jump to content

Arrow diagramming method

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ChuispastonBot (talk | contribs) at 13:35, 26 December 2010 (r2.5.2) (robot Adding: vi:Phương pháp Sơ đồ mạng mũi tên ADM). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Arrow Diagramming Method (ADM) is a network diagramming technique in which activities are represented by arrows.[1]

It is used for scheduling activities in a project plan.
The precedence relation between activities is represented by circles connecting to one or more arrows. The length of the arrow represents the duration of the relevant activity.

Sometimes a "dummy task" is added, to represent a dependency between tasks, which does not represent any activity.

ADM example

Use of the Arrow Diagramming Method as a common project management practice has declined with the adoption of computer-based scheduling tools. The Precedence Diagram Method (PDM) is often favored over the Arrow Diagraming Method.

The Arrow Diagramming Method is also known as the Activity-on-Arrow (AOA) method, it only show Finish to Start relationship.

[2]

ADM network drawing technique the start and end of each node or event is connected to an arrow.

The start of the arrow comes out of a node while the tip of the arrow goes into a node. Between the two nodes lies an arrow that represents the activity.

The event represented by the circular node consumes neither time nor resources.

  • A node is a specific, definable achievement in the project.
  • It has zero duration and consumes nil resources.
  • All activities that lead into a node must be completed before the activity lies following this node can start.


See also

References

  1. ^ CPM in Construction - A Manual for General Contractors(Copyright 1965 by the Associated General Contractors of America)
  2. ^ A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, 4th Edition: ANSI/PMI 99-001-2008 (copyright Project Management Institute, Inc. 2008)