Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Connectivity (computer science)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by One bot (talk | contribs) at 13:00, 20 December 2010 (Removing Category:Relisted AfD debates). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 13:00, 20 December 2010 by One bot (talk | contribs) (Removing Category:Relisted AfD debates)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 12:38, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Connectivity (computer science) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Dictionary definition. Can't grow to do anything useful beyond listing definitions in different contexts, which should be done at Connectivity#Technology instead. Fewer than 50 inbound links (most are dictionary-like, and some refer to Internet connectivity). Pnm (talk) 00:01, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 02:54, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:09, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Move - Agree with nominator that this article is nothing more than a dictionary def, with little prospect for significant expansion. The content of this article should appear as an entry at Connectivity#Technology rather than in article mainspace. Pol430 talk to me 13:04, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wizardman Operation Big Bear 19:00, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No merge. There's no evidence presented that this term actually means what the article claims. Pburka (talk) 20:10, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.