Jump to content

Wikipedia:Copyright problems/Without online source

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mozzerati (talk | contribs) at 20:51, 18 February 2006 (Suspected copyright infringements without online source). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

These need a thorough check for online sources, and if none are found, a check for offline sources.

  • Listed by User:Denni on VfD: The articles Sardinian (horse), Salerno (horse), Pleven (horse), and Russian Trotter were all posted within seven minutes of one another. They show remarkable consistency in format, almost as if they had been taken from a book on horses. A Google search for copyvio does not turn up any hits, which shows only that if these are copyvios, they are not from web resources. - Mike Rosoft 17:47, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • The uploader claims he reworded (in his own words) the text from a book. He didn't answer a follow-up question about which books. I'm very suspicious, but without evidence of a copyvio, I think we have to give him the benefit of the doubt. – Quadell (talk) (bounties) 18:19, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • If we don't know which book, then that may be legal, but is certainly plagiaristic and should really be enough to feel encouraged to delete in any case since having such pages makes Wikipedia a worse encyclopedia than not having it. Mozzerati 20:51, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Jacobo Arenas - This article appears to be a direct copy & paste of some (offline?) source(s), though I don't know for sure what would be the specific URL/source employed in the process.Juancarlos2004 2 July 2005 00:56 (UTC)
Additionally, the user responsible for this suspected copyvio is also behind a proven copyvio in the Manuel Marulanda article.Juancarlos2004 2 July 2005 00:55 (UTC)
  • Mary Wollstonecraft (Marriage section) "cribbed" (the original editor's characterization) from an episode of Simon Schama's History of Britain. See Wollstonecraft's Talk page for more details. (This item has also been discussed below in July 9th New Listings.) -Cate8 04:36, July 15, 2005 (UTC)
  • Ty Pennington - the second half of the article must be a copyvio (it sounds like a Sears ad), but I can't find from where. RADICALBENDER 23:41, August 21, 2005 (UTC)
  • Moro Crater massacre says that it was copied from a book, though it may be out of copyright. There was an online source which was taken down because of copyright problems. Even if it is not copyrighted, I'm not sure that the content is appropriate for Wikipedia (the event itself is). Perhaps it belongs in one of the other wikimedia projects. -- Kjkolb 05:43, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • this edit to Godspell. All of the anon's other contributions are copyvios (which I've reverted). I can't find an online source for this one, but I'm pretty sure it is a copyvio. I'd put it up in the no-online-source section, but the instructions say enter it here, so I'm doing that. JesseW, the juggling janitor 05:23, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
Found. According to number of websites, all but the first sentence comes from Mirror for Humanity, Conrad P. Kottak, Boston: The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2005. 66-68 (see Google}. Tearlach 19:53, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't know if it matters or not, and I don't have the book to see whether that claim is true or not, but according to those discussions, the bare list itself did not appear as such in the book but rather was extracted from the likely alphabetical series of bios on each scientist. Gene Nygaard 10:40, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please see also Wiki Books "Top 1000 Scientists from the begining of time to 2000 AD by Philip Barker".--Colin Harkness 16:54, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]