Talk:Straight-through processing
Appearance
what are the loopholes of STP.
- common sense - with some more time I will care for this... stub. Still I suggest you sign next time. --Martin0815 (talk) 10:52, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Hardly an advert?
The mention of a small, unknown, company, making its business around the NYSE, that is, with no international reach, is not only an advert, it is irrelevant. It offers e-trading onto a hand-held device. That has nothing to do with STP. This amalgam between e-trading and STP is deceiving and dishonest. And anyway Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia ; it is no place to single out any vendor.Bmathis (talk) 22:38, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
- You deleted an entire paragraph that appears to have far more significance than one small, unknown company. Whilst your point is valid, and you probably know more about the detail of the NYSE's history than I do, this looks like a job for editing rather than a block deletion. Your deletion left a gaping hole. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:23, 10 December 2010 (UTC)