Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fancy (programming language)

Fancy (programming language)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete No evidence of notability. No independent sources at all. PROD was contested. (By a strange error the PROD reason was given as "Not student project with no independent sources", but this was meant to say "Non-notable student project with no independent sources.") JamesBWatson (talk) 13:58, 26 November 2010 (UTC) JamesBWatson (talk) 13:58, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG--Korruski^Talk 14:45, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - article created with request from WP:RA. Pomepl (talk) 13:33, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I don't quite see your point. Why is that an argument to keep?--Korruski^Talk 22:39, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. No claim or evidence of notability. --Pnm (talk) 08:17, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as per nominator. Doesn't appear to be notable. Alas, we can't have an article for every project on github. bobrayner (talk) 04:42, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]