Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Composite Number Factoring Theorem
Appearance
- Composite Number Factoring Theorem (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to be original research, with little or no valuable content. (reposting original nom by user:DGG) — Fly by Night (talk) 17:46, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- Delete No evidence was provided that it is notable. Nor is there any reason to believe that it is a more efficient way to calculate factors than conventional methods or even of comparable efficiency. JRSpriggs (talk) 19:53, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Obvious original research. The WP:PROD tag should not have been removed. Sławomir Biały (talk) 19:20, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- I messed up here. I didn't realise it was a WP:PROD, I thought it was a partly filed WP:AfD I guess I'm off the hook because user Symbolsequence had challeneged the deletion on the user page, and all PRODs should be uncontested. But I am sorry for messing up. — Fly by Night (talk) 20:42, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 19:29, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- Delete, pure WP:OR. Nsk92 (talk) 19:35, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- Also, I did not quite understand why the prod tag was removed. The edit summary[1] was pretty confusing. Nsk92 (talk) 19:37, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- As I said, I mis-read the template. I couldn't find an AfD page and thought it was a half-done AfD. Sorry! — Fly by Night (talk) 20:46, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - clearly original research. Gandalf61 (talk) 21:37, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Once wp:or was pointed out to the article's creator on the talk page he agreed that the article should be deleted. Almost g7-able. 174.109.199.154 (talk) 23:49, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- Delete as OR. Ozob (talk) 23:52, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- Since there is a clear policy, I just follow.Symbolsequence