Jump to content

PI controller

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Yobot (talk | contribs) at 01:44, 23 November 2010 (WP:CHECKWIKI error fixes + genfixes using AWB (7419)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Basic block of a PI controller.

In control engineering, a PI Controller (proportional-integral controller) is a feedback controller which drives the plant to be controlled with a weighted sum of the error (difference between the output and desired set-point) and the integral of that value. It is a special case of the common PID controller in which the derivative (D) of the error is not used.

PI Controller Model

The controller output is given by

where is the error or deviation of actual measured value (PV) from the set-point (SP).

= SP - PV.

A PI controller can be modelled easily in software such as Simulink using a "flow chart" box involving Laplace operators:

where

= proportional gain
= integral gain

Setting a value for is often a trade off between decreasing overshoot and increasing settling time.

Finding a value for

Finding a proper value for is an iterative process.

1) Set a value for from the optimal range.

2) View the Nichols plot for the open-loop response of the system. Observe where the response curve crosses the 0dB line. This frequency is known as the cross-over frequency .

3) The value of can be calculated as:

4) Decreasing decreases the phase margin, however it eliminates the steady-state errors quicker.

Advantages and disadvantages

  • The integral term in a PI controller causes the steady-state error to reduce to zero, which is not the case for proportional-only control in general.
  • The lack of derivative action may make the system more steady in the steady state in the case of noisy data. This is because derivative action is more sensitive to higher-frequency terms in the inputs.
  • Without derivative action, a PI-controlled system is less responsive to real (non-noise) and relatively fast alterations in state and so the system will be slower to reach setpoint and slower to respond to perturbations than a well-tuned PID system may be.

See also

References