Jump to content

User talk:68.7.231.244

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ClueBot NG (talk | contribs) at 10:41, 21 November 2010 (Warning 68.7.231.244 - #1 Questions, comments, complaints -> BRFA). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for instructions. Thank you. Deconstructhis (talk) 04:27, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Roger Bell. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Deconstructhis (talk) 04:29, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did here: User:Deconstructhis. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Pinethicket (talk) 09:00, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Roger Bell, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Deconstructhis (talk) 13:32, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As has already been pointed out to you by another editor; personal attacks and threats of an "edit war", as you did in this comment [1] are not permitted. In regard to your continuing to add material to the encyclopedia in the Roger Bell article that is unsupported by the references you are supplying, please be aware that if challenged editors are responsible for providing a reference to support what they are contending. Instructing other editors to personally contact the subject of an article in order to substantiate material is not an acceptable practice. thanks Deconstructhis (talk) 13:32, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive comments.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at User:Deconstructhis, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Confession0791 talk 02:55, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.


You have been blocked temporarily from editing for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jujutacular talk 03:09, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Z8

ANI Notice

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Deconstructhis (talk) 18:52, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Block

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 Weeks for stalking and disruption. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Selket Talk 19:14, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Imperial Beach, California, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot NG.