Jump to content

Talk:Author Domain Signing Practices

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SineBot (talk | contribs) at 02:22, 19 November 2010 (Signing comment by RickWargo - ""Only phishing targets should define ADSP records": "). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Spelling convention

Doesn't it seem like this article should use the American spelling "Practices" rather than the British spelling "Practises" because this is the way that the specification is titled? --Flashcube (talk) 04:01, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Renamed to US spelling John L (talk) 21:56, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Only phishing targets should define ADSP records"

Who says that? The RFC "suggests" ADSP to phishing targets, but does not limit ADSP ("Only ...") to them.

  However, some domains might decide to sign all of their
  outgoing mail, for example, to protect their brand names.  It might
  be desirable for such domains to be able to advertise that fact to
  other hosts.

Stating that all your outgoing email is signed in the _adsp TXT record, this will prevent spamming using your domain name. If a receiver receives an email from your domain that has an _adsp TXT record without a signature (or it is invalid), it is immediately known the email is spam. I would strike this statement. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RickWargo (talkcontribs) 02:21, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]