Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How to specify a function

Delete per nom. PJM 14:20, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious keep. Not the best article, but the only thing that's non-encyclopedic about it is the title. It's not a how-to page, it's the beginning of a taxonomy that could become a reasonable subpage of function (expanding on the "Signifying functions" section).

There is already a section in Function (mathematics) about specifying a function. This article, with or without the bad title, is essentially a 'how to'. PJM 15:19, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Function specification Ruby 15:10, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as Wikipedia is not a how-to guide. --Ter e nc e Ong 15:39, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Function (mathematics). RJFJR 16:01, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge any usable content (this is not my field) per RJFJR. Delete as unencyclopedic "how-to". -- Krash (Talk) 16:04, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Function specification or Merge into Function (mathematics), per above. --James S. 16:24, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; a big poorly-organized lump of stuff. The distinction between extensional and intensional functions is important but not clearly explained here. Some of the ideas probably should be merged into function (mathematics), but I see no need to merge any of the text (meaning we don't have to preserve the history for GFDL), and the title is unfindable and so there's not much point in making it a redirect. --Trovatore 06:31, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per --Trovatore