Request concerning Hammer of Habsburg
- User requesting enforcement
- — kwami (talk) 02:06, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- User against whom enforcement is requested
- Hammer of Habsburg (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Sanction or remedy that this user violated
- WP:ARBMAC (article currently at 1RR)
- Diffs of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation how these edits violate it
- [1] (first revert, the limit per ARBMAC)
- [2] (second revert, violating 1RR)
- [3] (third revert)
- Diffs of notifications or of prior warnings against the conduct objected to (if required)
- HH has been blocked twice for violating 1RR on this article.[4]
- Chipmunkdavis warned HH to self-revert the third time.[5]
- Enforcement action requested (block, topic ban or other sanction)
- whatever you feel appropriate
- Additional comments by editor filing complaint
- HH reverted a line in a text that I was working out with another editor, Chipmunkdavis; we are trying to come up with some text that will resolve some of the objections Croats have about the article. The line was marked 'citation needed', as the point had been in the news but needs confirmation. (Waiting for response from the EU.) — kwami (talk) 02:06, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Notification of the user against whom enforcement is requested
- [6]
Discussion concerning Hammer of Habsburg
Statement by Hammer of Habsburg
Result concerning Hammer of Habsburg
- This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the section above.
Given two fairly recent blocks, I'm blocking for a week. T. Canens (talk) 02:49, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
In addition, given that all three 1RR blocks are for edit warring on the same article, under the authority of WP:ARBMAC#Discretionary sanctions, Hammer of Habsburg (talk · contribs) is hereby banned from the Croatian language article for one month. They are permitted to edit the talk page. T. Canens (talk) 02:58, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Striking that, since the user does not appear to have been served with an ARBMAC warning. Done now. The next violation will result in an article ban. T. Canens (talk) 03:00, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
| 
