Talk:Explicit formulae for L-functions
Appearance
![]() | Mathematics Start‑class Low‑priority | |||||||||
|
Error?
"...Riemann found an explicit formula for the number of primes π(x) less than a given number x." Should this not be the number of primes less than or equal to a given number x?
I tried to verify mathematically that the formula gives this, but I am not adept enough to work with it much...I did find that the f(x) formula can work either way (if pi(x) includes x, then f(x) includes x; and if pi(x) excludes x, then f(x) excludes x). This was quite simple using induction.
Besides verifying mathematically, I have always seen the prime counting function before as including x - and it is defined that way on the Wiki page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cstanford.math (talk • contribs) 01:33, 30 October 2010 (UTC)