Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hierarchical complexity

Keep Well referenced, but it just needs to be wikified Ruby 03:48, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The user who created this page, Commons@tiac.net, has no other contributions besides this and the seemingly related Stage and Hierarchical Complexity of Tasks, and most of the papers cited at both are by "Commons, M. L." Not necessarily a reason to delete, but needs to be noted. Withholding vote pending further research into the article itself. --Kinu 03:52, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete original research. — ciphergoth 11:10, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep with cleanup tags. 472 hits on google book search [1], also google scholar shows a similar amount [2] -- Astrokey44|talk 12:15, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't think that argues in favour of a keep. What sort of thing should be in a Wikipedia article about hierarchical complexity? I'm not sure there is a suitable such article. — ciphergoth 18:15, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete... well sourced but essentially an original essay.--Isotope23 17:16, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]