Talk:Preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation

Suggested move

It has been proposed in this section that Preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation be renamed and moved to Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation.

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

PROMETHEE → Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation — The article claims that the abbreviate is short for "Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation". According to WP:Article titles, "Abbreviations and acronyms are generally avoided unless the subject is almost exclusively known by its abbreviation (e.g. NATO and Laser). The abbreviation UK, for United Kingdom, is acceptable for use in disambiguation." As I don't see that the subject is known almost exclusively by its abbreviate. Obviously though, I feel that the abbreviation should be kept as a redirect to the main article. OlYeller^Talktome 18:47, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tell at first glance, the subject is known mainly by its abbreviation (at least, it will be far more recognizable by the abbreviation than by the extremely long full name).--Kotniski (talk) 07:36, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support Per WP:ABBR. The acronym is not so well known as to remain in abreviated form. The acronym can serve as a redirect.--Labattblueboy (talk) 13:46, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Author's notes

This article will be completed soon with :

application fields about the PROMETHEE method
example of appplications
the mathematics methodology