Jump to content

User talk:Exploding Boy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Alpha Quadrant (talk | contribs) at 18:37, 5 October 2010 (Proposed deletion of Paul Gerhard Vogel. (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Archive
Archives

1 2 3 4 5 6

Before making such sweeping changes to an article as this, please discuss them on the article talk page and gain a consensus. Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 06:36, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I have heard of being bold, in the context of bold, revert, discuss. You were bold, I reverted, now let's go to the talk page and discuss. Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 08:49, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Usman Sani requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies.

I realize this article has been on Wikipedia for 5 years, but I don't believe that the subject qualifies as notable for Wikipedia purposes. I did not tag the article for speedy deletion, but I think the editor who did tag it as such was probably correct. Metropolitan90 (talk) 21:45, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Usman Sani for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Usman Sani, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Usman Sani until a concensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SchuminWeb (Talk) 22:13, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk elections

Hi, this is just to inform you that elections for Clerkship at WP:UAA have started on the talk page. You have been sent this message because you were recently active in handling submissions or discussions. Discussion is ongoing and you are encouraged to voice your opinion on the candidates.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Fridae'sDoom (talk) at 06:44, 14 September 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob (talk) 23:33, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Paul Gerhard Vogel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article appears to be about a non-notable person. The sources provided are unreliable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Alpha Quadrant talk 18:37, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]