Talk:Simple API for XML
Huh?
Who wrote this text? I doubt computer geeks need a wiki entry for this. Can we tone it down a bit??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.228.222.129 (talk • contribs) 17:25, 13 April 2006
- Could you be a little more constructive in your criticism? Why does this article bother you so much? --85.224.6.48 14:47, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
- I am not sorry this article is here, and not sorry for what it says. But it needs much more! It needs a great deal of broader explanation and context. I have decades of computer tech experience, and I can only just barely guess what this article is about. After looking at the SAX and DOM articles, I still don't even really know what they are about, let alone understand the content. 69.87.200.97 20:09, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- May be. But the Russian article is more informative. :) 195.128.58.78 13:02, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- Well that does it. We have to get some good old fashion cold-war-era arms race going on here. But with wikis. A wiki-race. Unfortunetly, I know next to nothing about SAX vs. DOM and I was more interested in expat. 64.238.49.65 22:36, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- May be. But the Russian article is more informative. :) 195.128.58.78 13:02, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- I am not sorry this article is here, and not sorry for what it says. But it needs much more! It needs a great deal of broader explanation and context. I have decades of computer tech experience, and I can only just barely guess what this article is about. After looking at the SAX and DOM articles, I still don't even really know what they are about, let alone understand the content. 69.87.200.97 20:09, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Categories
Should this article be listed in Category:XML parsers ? The java implementation is an XML parser, but the article discusses SAX as a standard. 82.99.7.155 (talk) 13:37, 4 October 2010 (UTC)