Energy Multiplier Module
The "Energy Multiplier Module" (EM2) is a nuclear fission power reactor under development by General Atomics. It is a modified version of the Gas Turbine Modular Helium Reactor (GT-MHR) and is capable of converting spent nuclear fuel into electricity and industrial process heat, without separative or conventional nuclear reprocessing.[1]
Design Specifications
The EM2 is small-modular reactor expected to produce 240 MWe of power at 850°C and be fully enclosed in an underground containment structure.
The nuclear core design is based upon a new conversion technique in which an initial “starter” section of the core provides the neutrons required to convert used nuclear fuel or depleted uranium (DU) into burnable fissile fuel.[2] First generation EM2 units use uranium starters (approximately 15 percent U235) to initiate the conversion process.[3] The starter U235 is consumed as the used nuclear fuel/DU is converted to fissile fuel. The core life expectancy is approximately 30 years (using used nuclear fuel and DU) without refueling.
Substantial amounts of valuable fissile material remain in the EM2 core. This material is reused as the starter for a second generation of EM2s, without conventional reprocessing. There is no separation of individual heavy metals required and no enriched uranium needed. Only unusable fission products would be removed and stored.
All EM2 heavy metal discharges could be recycled into new EM2 units, effectively closing the nuclear fuel cycle, which minimizes nuclear proliferation risks and the need for long-term repositories to secure nuclear materials.
Economics & Workforce Capacity
The expected cost advantages of EM2 lie in its simplified power conversion system, which operates at high temperatures yielding approximately 50 percent greater efficiency and a corresponding one-third reduction in materials requirements than that of current nuclear reactors.[4]
Unlike light water reactors, the EM2 is gas cooled and does not need to be sited near a water source for cooling.
Each module can be manufactured in either U.S. domestic or foreign facilities using replacement parts manufacturing and supply chain management with large components shipped by commercial truck or rail to a site for final assembly, where it will be fully enclosed in an underground containment structure.
Nuclear Waste
The EM2 utilizes used nuclear fuel, also referred to as “spent fuel” from light water reactors.
Spent fuel rods from conventional nuclear reactors are put into storage and considered to be nuclear waste, by the nuclear industry and the general public.[5] Nuclear waste retains more than 95% of its original energy; the current U.S. inventory is equivalent to nine trillion barrels of oil - four times more than the known reserves. EM2 uses this nuclear waste to produce energy.
Non-proliferation
By using spent nuclear waste and depleted uranium stockpiles as its fuel source, a large-scale deployment of the EM2 is expected to reduce the long-term need for uranium enrichment and eliminate conventional nuclear reprocessing.[6]
Conventional light water reactors require refueling every 18 months. EM2’s 30-year fuel cycle minimizes the need for fueling handling and can reduce the proliferation concerns associated with refueling.
Energy Safety and Security
EM2 technology is designed to be inherently safe and to automatically shut down using the natural laws of physics.
The EM2’s high-operating temperature can provide process heat for petrochemical fuel products and alternative fuels, such as Biofuels and hydrogen.[7]
See also
- Nuclear power
- Nuclear safety in the United States
- Economics of new nuclear power plants
- United States Department of Energy
References
- ^ Freeman, Mike (Feb 24, 2010). "Company has plan for small reactors". San Diego Union Tribune.
- ^ “With Disposal Uncertain, Waste Burning Reactors Gain Traction – EM2 to Burn LWR Fuel,” Nuclear New Build Monitor, March 15, 2010
- ^ Parmentola, J. "Blue Ribbon Commission Webcast on America's Nuclear Future". Retrieved 15 March 2010.
- ^ Smith, Rebecca (Feb 22, 2010). "General Atomics Proposes a Plant That Runs on Nuclear Waste". Wall Street Journal.
- ^ Parmentola, John (March 11, 2010). "Letter to the Editor in Response to "Nuclear power – not a green option – it generates radioactive waste; it requires uranium that's dangerous to mine; it's hugely expensive,"". Los Angeles Times.
- ^ Fairley, Peter (May 11, 2010). "7. "Downsizing Nuclear Power Plants – Modular designs rely on 'economies of multiples' to make small reactors pay off big,"". IEEE Spectrum.
{{cite news}}: horizontal tab character in|title=at position 3 (help) - ^ "Blue Ribbon Commission Webcast on America's Nuclear Future". World Nuclear Association. August 2010.
External links
 | This article about nuclear power and nuclear reactors for power generation is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |