User talk:Exploding Boy

Xiruki tepe

what could be the reason? how can i follow A7? what to add? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Engkingkong (talk • contribs) 16:39, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thanks for your vigilence! I was just trying it out really and I appreciate that this is NOT the forum for advertising - I'd just had a good meal there that's all! I won't thank you for your commentary on the name as it holds little merit, but once again, thanks for keeping Wikipedia free of twits like me who try to turn everything into a spruiking session... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hill of Different Beans (talk • contribs) 05:25, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome? :) Exploding Boy (talk) 05:28, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paul Gerhard Vogel

The article Paul Gerhard Vogel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Tagged for sourcing issues since Jan 2009, this biography of a possibly living person has no references at all within the definition of WP:RS and WP:V.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kudpung (talk) 05:44, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Exploding Boy. You have new messages at Kudpung's talk page.
Message added 06:38, 28 August 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Orgy

Before making such sweeping changes to an article as this, please discuss them on the article talk page and gain a consensus. Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 06:36, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I have heard of being bold, in the context of bold, revert, discuss. You were bold, I reverted, now let's go to the talk page and discuss. Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 08:49, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Usman Sani

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Usman Sani requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies.

I realize this article has been on Wikipedia for 5 years, but I don't believe that the subject qualifies as notable for Wikipedia purposes. I did not tag the article for speedy deletion, but I think the editor who did tag it as such was probably correct. Metropolitan90 (talk) 21:45, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Usman Sani for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Usman Sani, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Usman Sani until a concensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SchuminWeb (Talk) 22:13, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]