Jump to content

Talk:Architecture description language

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by HacksawPC (talk | contribs) at 06:27, 24 August 2010 (Architecture vs. design). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconComputing Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The definition provided is very much a definition of an SADL rather than an ADL in general. In other words, Software-Architecture Description Language. There are also languages for the description of Enterprise Architecture, which are clearly also ADL's: ArchiMate, MEMO, DEMO, etc. These languages do not necessarily refer to software components, etc. Nevertheless, they are ADL's.

Erikproper (talk) 05:59, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Architecture vs. design

Quoting from this section:

..whereas design is a principle through which functional requirements are accomplished.

Design is a principle? It is an activity or the result of this activity. But "a principle"? I never encountered the word design with this sense nor dictionaries report it. Can some native English speaker shed some light?

--MaD70 (talk) 11:33, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Process is a better word, I changed things a bit, and made the sentence more active.

HacksawPC (talk) 06:27, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]