Talk:Institute in Basic Life Principles
Why merge? Because the institute IS Gothard and Gothard IS the institute. Harvestdancer 21:00, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
- See the AfD discussion [[1]] for a discussion of whether to merge or delete one of the articles.--Gandalf2000 21:21, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
- The Articles for Deletion debate resulted in a "keep" (archived discussion can be found here). Not sure about merging though. Weien 06:29, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
The merge and such
I say don't merge. While the organization and the man are pretty much the same, they are separate subjects.
On the side, while I don't have references handy, I can certianly vouch for some of the "citation needed" parts, including former supporters completely abandoning christianity, using non-scriptural testimonials to support points, and seeming to have ever answer for a question (that's not to say they shouldn't be cited though - I'll see what I can do about digging up some of the old family literature). I doubt I'll be able to cite much on former followers abandoning church alltogether, I doubt it's been written on.
Jordanmills 14:46, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
We could probably pull the Forty-nine character virtues into the IBLP article, since these 49 don't appear to have a life of their own outside IBLP.
As to the fallout of former participants, I am guessing the most we'll find are informal exposés and discussion boards such as this [2] and this [3]. In reality, it appears most students who go through the IBLP/Gothard/ATI programs eventually abandon the Gothard camp for other Christian groups or churches.--Gandalf2000 18:59, 1 February 2006 (UTC) After following the first link in this article, which references an article on the Character Training Institute, I think the 49 character virtues should go into an article on CTI, since that is their most public presence.