Cell Transmission Model

Cell Transmission Model (CTM) is a popular numerical method proposed by Daganzo (1994) to solve the kinematic wave equation (Lighthill and Witham, 1955; Richards, 1956). Lebacque (1996) later showed that CTM is indeed the first order discrete Godunov approximation (Godunov, 1959).

Background

CTM predicts macroscopic traffic behavior on a given corridor by evaluating the flow and density at finite number of intermediate points at different time steps. This is done by dividing the corridor into homogeneous sections (hereafter called cells) and numbering them i=1, 2… n starting downstream. The length of the cell is chosen such that it is equal to the distance traveled by free-flow traffic in one evaluation time step. The traffic behavior is evaluated every time step starting at t=1,2…m. Initial and boundary conditions are required to iteratively evaluate each cell.

The flow across the cells is determined based on and , two monotonic functions that uniquely define the fundamental diagram as shown in Figure 1. The density of the cells is updated based on the conservation of inflows and outflows. Thus, the flow and density are derived as:

Where:

 and represent density and flow in cell i at time t. Similarly , , ,and  represents jam density,  capacity, wave speed, and free-flow speed respectively of the fundamental diagram.

• 
  Figure 1. Demand and supply functions (Figure obtained from Laval(2004))

CTM produces results consistent with the continuous Kinematic wave equation when the density specified in the initial condition changes gradually. However, CTM replicates discontinuities and shock that take a span of few cells of space but moves at correct speed predicted by the Kinematic wave equation.

It was observed that as time passes, the CTM approximations result in spreading the shock to a growing number of cells. To eliminate spreading of certain shocks, Daganzo (1994) proposed a modification to the CTM that ensures shocks separating a lower upstream density and greater downstream density do not spread.

CTM is robust and the simulation results do not depend on the order in which the cells are evaluated because the flow entering a cell is dependent only on the current conditions within the cell and is unrelated to the flow exiting the cell. Thus, CTM can be applied for the analysis of complex networks and non-concave fundamental diagrams.

Implementation and Example

Consider a 2.5 kilometer homogeneous arterial segment that follows a triangular fundamental diagram as shown in figure 2.

Figure 2. Fundamental diagram for the example

This corridor is divided into 30 cells and is simulated for 480 seconds with a time step of 6 second. The Initial and boundary conditions are specified as follows: K(x,0)=48 x K(0,t)=48 t K(2.5,t)=0 t

The corridor has two signals located at milepost 1 and 2 starting upstream. The signals have a split of 30 seconds and a cycle length of 60 second. With this information, it is a simple matter of iteration of equations (1) for all the cells and time steps. Figure 3 and Table 1 shows the spatial and temporal distribution of density for the case of offset=0 seconds.

• 
  Figure 3. Density plot for the example with offset of 0 seconds

Table 1: Density values for the example with offset of 0 seconds

Lagged Cell Transmission Model

Since the original Cell Transmission model is a first order approximation, Daganzo (1999) proposed the Lagged Cell Transmission Model (LCTM) that is more accurate than the former. This enhanced model uses lagged downstream density (p time steps earlier than the current time) for the receiving function, . If a triangular fundamental diagram is used and lag is chosen appropriately, this improved method is second order accurate.

when the highway is discritized with variable cell lengths, then one should introduce forward lag for the sending function to preserve the good properties of LCTM. The choice of backward lag and forward lag are given by:

backward lag forward lag

where d and ε are the spatial and temporal steps of the cell, is the maximum free-flow speed, w is the maximum backward propagating wave speed.

Newell’s Exact Method

Newell (1993) proposed an exact method to solve the kinematic wave equation based on cumulative curves only at either ends of the corridor, without evaluating any intermediate points.

Since the density is constant along the characteristics, if one knows the cumulative curves A(x0,t0) and flow q(x0,t0) at boundary, one can construct the three dimensional surface (A,x,t). However, if characteristics intersect, the surface is a multi-valued function of x,t based on the initial and boundary conditions it is derived from. In such a case, a unique and continuous solution is obtained by taking the lower envelop of the multi-valued solution derived based on different boundary and initial conditions.

However, the limitation of this method is that it can not be used for non-concave fundamental diagrams.

Newell proposed the method, but Daganzo (2006) using variational theory proved that the lower envelop is the unique solution.