Talk:Uniform Building Code

Merger with International Building Code

Disagree with the suggestion to merge with International Building Code. This was a different document published by a different organization. Links to IBC are provided. Newell Post (talk) 20:28, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I had always thought that the Uniform Building code was a predessescor to the International Building code. Especially considering it ceased with the introduction of the new International buidling code. They are essentially the same documents with additional expansions. I would strongly support merger between these two articles. However I oppose merger into the article 'building code' Ottawa4ever (talk) 10:53, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have subsequently linked this discussion with the above discussion Ottawa4ever (talk) 12:00, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I do not support merging the two documents, especially not IBC into UBC as the link at IBC seems to indicate (if any merger, it should be the other way around). The UBC article needs more substance, however. GUÐSÞEGN – U T E X – 20:38, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that these document should not be merged. They are two separate codes and should be stand alone documents. V767 (talk)16 August 2010