Jump to content

Talk:Commander's Digest

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Guillaume2303 (talk | contribs) at 07:51, 2 August 2010 (Commander's Digest and Command Policy: better). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconMagazines Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.
WikiProject iconMilitary history: North America / United States Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on the project's quality scale.
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
North American military history task force
Taskforce icon
United States military history task force

Commander's Digest and Command Policy

I note that in this article it is mentioned that this magazine was succeeded by (renamed to) Command Policy, with a redlink to that title. I would suggest that it might be better not to create a separate article but to consider both magazines as one and the same, with only a title change. That will make it easier to expand the current stub to a more substantial article. In that case, it might be best to move this article to "Command Policy". Just a suggestion, I am not much interested in magazines and will not be watchlisting this page (so no use answering me here... :-). For the moment, I'll remove the redlink, but feel free to revert if it would be better to keep the two separate. --Crusio (talk) 07:47, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]