Talk:Commander's Digest

Magazines Stub‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Military history: North America / United States Stub‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Stub

This article has been rated as Stub-class on the project's quality scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Commander's Digest and Command Policy

I note that in this article it is mentioned that this magazine was succeeded by (renamed to) Command Policy, with a redlink to that title. I would suggest that it might be better not to create a separate article but to consider both magazines as one and the same, with only a title change. That wil make it easier to expand the current stub to a more substantial article. Just a suggestion, I am not much interested in magazines and will not be watchlisting this page (so no use answering me here... :-). For the moment, I'll redirect Command Policy here and will remove the redlink, but feel free to revert if it would be better to keep the two separate. --Crusio (talk) 07:47, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]