Jump to content

Talk:Geometric Shapes (Unicode block)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by DePiep (talk | contribs) at 03:52, 2 August 2010 (moved Talk:Geometric Shapes Unicode block to Talk:Geometric shapes: per MOS: name as in Unicode (and dab when needed -- not here)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconTypography List‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Typography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Typography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
ListThis article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
WikiProject iconComputing List‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
ListThis article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Redirect

I noticed that "●" redirects here. Should I put a notice at the start of the page that there is a Pearl Jam song called "" on their album Yield? Tezkag72 (talk) 01:57, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ehh, I did it. If anyone wants to remove it, they can. Tezkag72 (talk) 14:06, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Only fonts?

The part that says those are the only fonts that got allt he glyphs, seems like a very limited analysis of all fonts there are out there, the site that says the only fonts with 100% coverage doesn't actually says that, it just got a list of fonts and how much they cover --TiagoTiago (talk) 22:23, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]