Talk:Critical path method

Outdated by 25 years!

The arrow diagram shown in this article reflects a methodology (Arrow Diagramming Method) that has not been popular for more than 25 years! This is the kind of outdated, obsolete and useless informations that infects the Scheudling Practice. This page needs to be completely rewritten. As soon as I have time, I will put something up, for review and consideration.ICSGlobal (talk) 14:02, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Someone Else's Comment

131.110.83.17 16:42, 4 January 2007 (UTC)The statement critical path has no float is not correct. Critical path is defined as "the longest path through the network with the least amount of float. The critical path can contain float. But, it contains the least amount of float.

I disagree

A better definition of critical path is: the longest path of interdependent activities in a schedule network, whereby if any activity on the critical path is delayed by a certain duration, the project completion will be delayed by the same duration.

The critical path will be the path with the least amount of float, but many experts believe the critical path of a schedule should have no float. While it is possible for a critical path to have float, such float is most likely the result of a project completion constraint (i.e., a "Must Finish" constraint) in the scheduling software, which will give a project that is ahead of schedule postitive float and a project that is behind schedule negative float. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pkurtross (talk • contribs) 19:28, 14 May 2007 (UTC).

Kantian Origins?

I am in no way a management expert, but If I'm not mistaken, the whole notion of "critical path" originated as a concept in philosophy, in Immanuel Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. If that's the case -- and if this isn't a matter of the same term being reinvented for use in an entirely different sense -- it really ought to be mentioned here. --Michael K. Smith (talk) 03:28, 6 January 2008 (UTC) This topic is missing images or graphics, it's almost only text. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.171.132.202 (talk) 12:38, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Downright awful

This was obviously written by someone who doesn't have a clue about either CPM or Critical Path Analysis. CPM was initially developed as a computer program. I'll try to come back and rewrite. I suspect this piece of garbage was put together by someone who had just completed their first PM training course. (Bill Duncan, PM Partners) Wrduncan3 (talk) 19:56, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Timeline of CPM & PERT Development

The Thayer book cited in recent revisions to this article contains transcripts of interviews with DuPont personnel from the 1940s. One of these suggests that DuPont at some point shared CPM concepts current at that time with the Navy. This calls into question the independence of the development of PERT. However, Kelley, who worked on the UNIVAC implementation of CPM, was not aware that DuPont may have shared CPM with the Navy. Kelley was, afterall, with Remington Rand, not DuPont.

It should be understood that the timeline for development of CPM concepts extends much farther into DuPont's past than has been generally known. Again, the Thayer reference supports this view from the perspective of first hand participants with it from the 1940s. There are differing claims by those interviewed by Thayer regarding what CPM was actually called in the 40s. It seems most likely that Kelley and Walker did indeed adopt the term "Critical Path" from the PERT team. In fact, Kelley & Walker say as much is their 1989 retrospective, and state that it was for marketing purposes.

Apparently CPM implementation in the 1940s was not computer-based. It was manual and centered on what we now know as Activity-on-Arrow or Arrow Diagramming methods. It would be nice to have physical records of these early CPM schedules, but Thayer was not able to discover any in DuPont's or Hanford's archives while writing his book.

Tnanoc (talk) 17:58, 26 July 2010 (UTC)