Talk:Rc (Unix shell)

Computing Stub‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Requested move

RC royial cycle rc shell → rc … Rationale: Just like mk its the only thing that is actually called rc … eeemess 02:31, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~

Support eeemess 02:31, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Move, obviously. —Nightstallion (?) ^{Seen this already?} 14:35, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Oppose Royal Crown ("RC") Cola. --Johnny (Cuervo) 21:05, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fonts

The fonts that used for code examples, which supposedly should be fixed-width (because they use either <TT>/</TT> or <PRE>/</PRE> constructs), are rendered just like normal fonts. I looked at the page source, and it really has some stylesheets that do explictly command that bogus behavior. How do we get rid of those bogus stylesheets? Pappires (talk) 03:23, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't look at the source, but FWIW, it renders fine (i.e. in a fixed width font) for me. --Cybercobra (talk) 03:32, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

,,More dynamic piping´´

How are the examples in that part of the article ,,more dynamic´´ than what Bash supports?

Yes, their syntax is simpler.

Yes, feel free to say ,,in rc, dynamic piping is much simpler.´´

No, rc is not ,,more powerful´´ in that aspect. Read bash(1) and stop fanboying. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.116.207.116 (talk) 15:20, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]