Jump to content

Talk:End-user (computer science)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Paulmnguyen (talk | contribs) at 05:12, 21 July 2010 (Merge proposal). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconComputing Redirect‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
RedirectThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis redirect has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconComputer science Redirect‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
RedirectThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis redirect has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Merge proposal

These two articles cover what is basically the same subject. I can see some subtle differences in End-User referring to the social aspects and User being more frequent as the programming object that proxies for the real person, but they ultimately refer to the same concept. Should both terms be covered in one article, or is there a fundamental difference that I'm missing? Diego (talk) 11:33, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that they should be merged. However, the content in End-User seems to be subordinate to the content in User. I think that User is the more generic name - the two topics currently represented are regarding the UML Actor (here) and the concept of a user account or encapsulated notion of a human person's combined identification and personal information within the context of a computer system or software application. The username redirect to User_(computing) is evidence of this distinction. Anyone else on how to resolve this? I'm willing to write to expand the stub once we figure out where we're going with it. Paulmnguyen (talk) 05:12, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]