User talk:Paxcoder

Free sofware vs. Open source

Thanks for pointing this out. Please see my comment on this. Thank you.--torusJKL (talk) 13:05, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Free software

Hi... Why the image is a pointless image man?... is related to free and open sources licences, and the relation to all who interact for make software... really I made a mistake when you add it first ... so I removed that from that place ... Thank you for sending this message ... maybe you can tell me any image related to this, after that I design, and places it in the right place...

V A R G U X write me a comment 05:36, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment again... Well, I drew this picture ... perhaps, as you mention, I should add arrow and some description, with a caption below.

I will create a new version, adding what you mention and some things that are useful and which are related to FOSS.

V A R G U X

write me a comment 02:28, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gnewsense

Hi Paxcoder, i dont understand it, on 4 October you add GNU/Linux to the article [[2]] with a comment, and today the reverse, whats up ? also there is no user Paxcoder who joined Talk:GNewSense. So feel free to do so now Mion (talk) 16:55, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

no appologies needed, solved. Cheers Mion (talk) 21:32, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

About my quote on St. Ignatius

Thanks for not removing the quote Paxcoder. I understand all that stuff about importance when adding citations, but to be honest, what is more important than Ignatius' quotes about Jesus? I mean, people who go to St. Ignatius' page are almost certainly going because of their curiosity of his relation to Jesus. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Glorthac (talk • contribs) 03:09, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Templates

Regardless of what you may think of me personally, you should not engage in an edit-war to push new edits. The issue here is very simple, the simplest even. Does the Template:Infobox Cardinal add titles like "Sir" or "Blessed" in the name= parameter. The saint template naturally does include the sainthood honorific - since its a template on sainthood. This may not be the case with Template:Infobox Cardinal, simply establish if it is. You see, I have my doubts since no other template of this sort includes honorifics of any sort. But if I'm wrong in this case, please, prove me wrong with examples of Cardinal template use. If you by any chance are unable to do so, please do not hold a grudge and push on regardless, it will most likely get us nowhere.

One important disclaimer: I am not religious myself, but I wouldn't dream of trying to dissuade others from their religion nor try to insult their holy persons and icons. This is not an issue of "religion vs. atheism", however, but of "honorific or no honorific" in those specific type of templates. --DIREKTOR ^(TALK) 21:56, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

You have been reported on WP:ANI for continuous user abuse. [3] --DIREKTOR ^(TALK) 13:10, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Aloysius Stepinac. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. Specifically this edit. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 15:12, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:OWNTALK he can remove whatever he wants from his talk page. N419 BH 15:44, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry N419BH, was that with regards to my template or just incorrectly indented? I'm not sure how it relates. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 17:11, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FYI warning note

You are repeatedly adding a template to User_talk:DIREKTOR, a users talkpage, editors are allowed to remove such notification templates, your repeated replacement of it after the user has removed is edit warring and such behavior can be subject to Administrative action and a reduction in your editing privileges, please stop. Off2riorob (talk) 17:36, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]