Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Fetchcomms
Voice your opinion on this candidate (talk page)
(0/0/0); Scheduled to end 18:10, 5 June 2025 (UTC) Remove the <!-- and --> around subst: in the #time parser function (as well as this comment) once you transclude this request.
Nomination
Fetchcomms (talk · contribs) – I am happily putting forward Fetchcomms forward for the mop. Fetchcomms has been with us since the beginning of last October, making 27,000 contributions, half of which to unique pages. Active in the mainspace, Fetchcomms has 14 Did you know? hooks and two good articles this one and this one. Fetchcomms is also active in the various activities of maintaining the article space with reverting vandalism, correcting mechanics, referencing, etc. In addition to the article space work, Fetchcomms is an extraordinary helper for new and learning Wikipedians, dealing with real-time assistance in [irc:#wikipedia-en-help] and responding to Template:Xtl:helpme requests on-site as well as familiarity with the appropriate noticeboards and interaction with administrators.
Fetchcomms is trusted with rollback, account creator, and reviewer. Let's just bundle it up into sysop. Keegan (talk) 22:25, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
- 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
- A:
- 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
- A:
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A:
General comments
- Links for Fetchcomms: Fetchcomms (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
- Edit summary usage for Fetchcomms can be found here.
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review his contributions before commenting.
Discussion
Support
Oppose
Neutral