Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ZipcodeZoo
Appearance
- ZipcodeZoo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't find significant coverage for this website. Joe Chill (talk) 14:02, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- Joe Chill (talk) 14:08, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:13, 6 June 2010 (UTC) - Keep. One of the news hits said that the website crashed shortly after opening. Seems notable.-- φ OnePt618Talk φ 04:14, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- I want to amend my erroneous statement above -- the news article was actually referring to another site. I still feel this is notable enough to keep around.-- φ OnePt618Talk φ 04:23, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- Do you have any guideline based reason for this keep? Joe Chill (talk) 06:04, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- I want to amend my erroneous statement above -- the news article was actually referring to another site. I still feel this is notable enough to keep around.-- φ OnePt618Talk φ 04:23, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. -- φ OnePt618Talk φ 04:14, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - as per nom. Codf1977 (talk) 11:34, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
- Keep 5 results from Google news search, 14 from Google book search, and 85 from Google scholar. The news articles mostly require you pay to read them, so I can't see exactly what's there. This stands out though. "ZipcodeZoo offers descriptions of over 3 million species of plants and animals, with 250,000 photos, maps, pronunciations, and definitions in 13 languages." Sounds notable to me. That's the largest collection of species I find mentioned anywhere. Dream Focus 05:27, 10 June 2010 (UTC)