Talk:Program Manager

Microsoft Windows: Computing Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft Windows, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microsoft Windows on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Microsoft WindowsWikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsTemplate:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsMicrosoft Windows
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

program manager

This is also a role within software development, needs to be expanded.

That's what the disambiguation page is for. ...teddy 18:06, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Windows NT 3.1.png

The image Image:Windows NT 3.1.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --05:44, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Shell=" value name does not exist; "Shell" value name does.

The reason it now says "...by specifying the Shell value" is because in Regedit.exe and Regedt32.exe (both are the registry editor executables), I saw the name of that value and it is not named "Shell=". Instead, it is named "Shell". If you think this is false, try to prove I'm wrong.Jerrysmp (talk) 19:54, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Modern variants"

I think such a section does not deserve a place inline with the article content. At most, it should be an external link. I don't want to get into an edit war so anyone agrees? - xpclient ^Talk 08:18, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, It was me who put it in there. Sorry about that. :-) Firstly: Thank you for not simply destroying information. Secondly: I disagree, because this sort of useful hints is exactly what I am often looking for in Wikipedia. Thirdly: I'm taking it out again, because a) Unfortunately I can't find a single tool which tries to emulate the functionality of Program Manager, and b) In the meantime I have tested Stardock Fences and it's not exactly what I thought it was. - So I'll apologize for putting forward badly researched information, but not for adding related information to the article in principle.

Text was: "For the user who enjoyed the kind of interface provided by Program Manager there are similar utilities available as an add-on to the later versions of Windows, such as Fences by Stardock Corporation"

--BjKa (talk) 13:27, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]