Jump to content

Talk:Interlock protocol

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SineBot (talk | contribs) at 06:09, 31 May 2010 (Signing comment by Zooko - ""). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconComputing Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

What does "zipless" mean for a secure channel? --68.102.252.87 06:47, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm the inventor the Forced Latency Protocol. The Forced Latency Protocol is not a variant or an extension of the Interlock Protocol. They are both protocols which attempt to defend against Man-In-The-Middle attack even when the honest participants do not share any pre-existing keying material. There the similarities end. --Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zooko (talkcontribs) 06:09, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]