Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Positive Alternatives to Homosexuality

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Correct, it isn't notable. Merge and redirect to Ex-gay, which is.—S Marshall T/C 19:20, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It appears to meet notability requirements [1] [2] [3] separate from the ex-gay topic itself. Mandsford 20:26, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
it is notable because it is a worldwide organisation. --Diskriminierung (talk) 21:11, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Appears notable. I'm not sure about the neutrality of the word "therapies" in this context though, as the definition implies treatment of a health problem or disability.—RJH (talk) 21:14, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
WP:N: received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. I cited a few of this sources in the article. --Diskriminierung (talk) 12:50, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:36, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:36, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It appears to meet notability requirements. 80.187.111.78 (talk) 19:46, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. 80.187.111.78 (talk) 19:47, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I don't believe they're anywhere near right, but they seem to be a substantial organization.Spoonkymonkey (talk) 16:41, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]