Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green (programming language)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ron Ritzman (talk | contribs) at 00:00, 23 May 2010 (Relisting debate). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Green (programming language) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found zero sources for this programming language. Joe Chill (talk) 12:35, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- Joe Chill (talk) 12:36, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I found the primary source for this, . doi:10.1016/j.cl.2005.07.001. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help); Missing or empty |title= (help), but it has only 16 citations [1] so far in Google scholar, and most of them are self-citations; CiteSeerX only found two citations, both self- [2]; 0 citations in ACM's digital library [3]. The wiki page was written by the paper/language's author, User talk:Josedeoliveiraguimaraes. Wasn't able to find any other coverage. Pcap ping 09:36, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Multiple publications about this language in reliable peer-reviewed academic journals. I see no requirement in WP:N that those publications are themselves cited in other publications. As the journals are peer reviewed, the publications cannot be considered as non-independent of the authors of the language. Also, speaking as a computer scientist, its type system sounds somewhat interesting, and it is the kind of thing we should probably keep a basic article on just as an example of variations on the normal way of doing things. JulesH (talk) 20:33, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]