Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Curly bracket programming language

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see why we should have an article about programming languages that use a particular set of delimiters. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:02, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm broadly with Sarek. "Curly bracket programming language" doesn't seem to be a defining characteristic for programming languages, and usage of the term "curly bracket programming language" in reliable sources seems to be rather lacking. But, wouldn't it be reasonable to place a redirect to List of programming languages by category#Curly-bracket languages here?—S Marshall ^Talk/_Cont 21:16, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Wouldn't be an unreasonable thing to do... --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 21:21, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - You happy to withdraw the nomination and redirect it instead, Sarek? Cos if so we can close this.—S Marshall ^Talk/_Cont 21:38, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    - I'd like to wait a bit and see what other people think first. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 13:56, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:03, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. Seems to be a valid categorization in some sources, e.g. [1] some "for dummies" books. Pcap ping 01:51, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]