Jump to content

Talk:Midpoint method

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 203.206.220.108 (talk) at 01:24, 1 May 2010 (Accuracy). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconMathematics Start‑class Low‑priority
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

Accuracy

This method looks like it will always be less acurate, and require more computation than the Euler method done with step size h/2. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Neiljackson (talkcontribs).

That is not correct. The midpoint method gives an accuracy of O(h^3), compared to O(h^2) for Euler's method. So overall you gain by using this instead of Euler's method, even in spite of more computation involved. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 00:48, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Midpoint is indeed of a higher order than simple Euler's method. However, "higher order is not always higher accuracy". KTC 10:35, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison Graphs

The graph comparison should be drawn against Euler method using h/2 step size because in terms of evaluation of the system of equations, that is the equivalent computation. 203.206.220.108 (talk) 01:24, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]