Jump to content

Talk:Comparison of JavaScript-based source code editors

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Wcris (talk | contribs) at 16:22, 28 April 2010 (Google Code Playground and Firebug). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

So... if someone is watching this, could they tell me if this page needs some kind of "page looks merely to be a commercial or FOSS product list" warning.


Also what about the Amy Editor ? It appears to be a powerful editor, but is it based on one of the engines listed? Is it free or a commercial project? Should it be listed here? 80.200.132.241 (talk) 07:39, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Google Web Toolkit

I haven't had time to look fully into it, but should [[1]] be here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.225.18.78 (talk) 05:34, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Google Code Playground and Firebug

Should Google Code Playground be listed? I think so, although it is primly indicated to experiment and testing with Google api libraries, it is nonetheless a javascript-based source code editor with basic debug features. I have more doubts with respect to Firebug, it's an inline (~sort of) editor and debugger Firefox extension, but javascript? Perhaps, but let's not forget that Firefox XUL engine supports XPCOM, so it can embed code in other languages besides JavaScript. But if we interpret 'javascript-based' as 'web-based', it can apply.--Wcris (talk) 16:16, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]