Jump to content

Template talk:Infobox classical composer/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jubileeclipman (talk | contribs) at 21:18, 21 April 2010 (Parameters: makes sense). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Notes for converting Infobox musical artist to use this

Most fields are the same, so it's a fairly easy switch. A few fields are added; a few (agreed upon) are lost. Fields that need to be checked:

  • Occupation - if it only contains a single value ("Composer") then remove this field from the article. If more than one, then change the field-title to "Occupations".
  • Era - this field and value can be added - see /doc page for the suggested values to use.
  • List of works - this field and value can be added

All other fields can be deleted. (specifically: Background, Origin, Instrument, Years_active, Label, URL, Notable_instruments)

Ask at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Infoboxes (or me) for any future assistance. :) -- Quiddity (talk) 07:48, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone mind if I convert this to use the meta template {{infobox}}. This is assuming that there is no significant change to its appearance of course. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:14, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do. I tried at one point, but never got back to it. -- Quiddity (talk) 20:27, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Version in the /sandbox and examples on /testcases. The only real difference seems to be the width, which is 22em. I believe this is the usual "recommended" infobox width. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 21:01, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Parameters

Can I suggest some simplification of the names of the parameters?

  • Using all lowercase is easier to type, i.e. "occupations" instead of "Occupations".
  • "image" might be clearer than "Img".

— Martin (MSGJ · talk) 21:04, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Makes sense to me --Jubileeclipman 21:18, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]