Talk:Sentence spacing in language and style guides

Split attribution

Title

The title may not be the best choice. I thought it more concise than List of style guide: Guidance on sentence spacing. Perhaps there is a better choice. Airborne84 (talk) 16:05, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What about List of sentence spacing style guides? --JorisvS (talk) 16:59, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Or better yet, Sentence spacing style guides, as the article is not, in fact, a list. --JorisvS (talk) 22:08, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Seems OK. I was trying to determine if "list" was appropriate. This list encompasses (or ideally should encompass) language guides also. Maybe Sentence spacing: Style guides is enough, but a more descriptive title would be Sentence spacing: Style and language guides. I don't know if that's too much.

I'd like to hold with the current title for a couple of days. I realized that when people type in "List of style guides" into the Wikipedia search bar, this one appears below it. I don't know how many people type in the words "List of style guides" for a search, but it's something worth considering - even if in passing. Airborne84 (talk) 02:28, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and by the way, if you've no issue with the article's notability (and other elements that make an appropriate Wikipedia article), feel free to remove the tag on the main page. I won't take it off, so someone else will need to. Airborne84 (talk) 02:30, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Will they no longer see this article in searches if leave this page a redirect? (I don't know for certain.) Also, just a handful of people a day visit that page, see its page view statistic, so even fewer people must search for the title.

Reading WP:N I can't see a reason why this wouldn't merit its own article (the subject need not be the main topic of the sources), so I'll remove the tag in a minute. --JorisvS (talk) 08:22, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. That was the big thing I was wondering - if the subject needed a secondary source to identify it specifically. I think it's as relevant and notbale article at Wikipedia as many others though—even if it is a niche area. GOod point about the redirect. I don't know. It really doesn't matter. If this doesn't meet the qualifications of a list, it shouldn't be called "List of...", regardless of search aids. Airborne84 (talk) 13:43, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]