Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Java.lang
Delete. This, and all the other articles concerning the Java standard packages, is merely a list of all included classes. This is already very well documented in Sun's javadoc and is useless. (I don't know of a single developer or layman that will use the page.) In short: It is non-encyclopedic. - ElAmericano | talk 01:57, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
- Agreed --Hooperbloob 02:12, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Should probably also add java.lang.ref and java.lang.reflect to this list as well. -- ShinmaWa(talk) 02:40, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, agreed. -Will 02:50, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as listcruft. Wikipedia is not a manpage. Segv11 (talk/contribs) 03:04, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete all three (java.lang and .ref and .reflect). Maybe setup a redirect to Java, which has links to Sun's site. Cyde Weys 2M-VOTE 05:17, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
- Slight merge all to Packages in Java. —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-16 05:50Z
- Comment. Enough overview is included in Java 2 Platform, Standard Edition. We can't really add more without just listing classes. - ElAmericano | talk 16:19, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
- Okay. Redirect to Packages in Java or Java 2 Platform, Standard Edition —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-17 01:49Z
- Redirect per Quarl. Stifle 20:48, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
- Strong delete, WP is not online documentation system. Do the same to .ref and .reflect. Pavel Vozenilek 21:44, 17 January 2006 (UTC)