Jump to content

Talk:Christ myth theory/Sources

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SlimVirgin (talk | contribs) at 17:07, 13 April 2010 (started page). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This is a list of the sources for Christ myth theory, any relevant qualifications, positions held, and publications.

Comtemporary

G.A. Wells (born 1926)
  • Education: Degrees in German, philosophy, and natural science. Phd, specialization unknown.
  • Relevant specialization:
  • Relevant publications:
  • The Jesus of the Early Christians (Pemberton 1971);
  • Did Jesus exist? (Prometheus Books 1987);
  • The Jesus Myth (Open Court 1998);
  • Religious Postures: Essays on Modern Christian Apologists and Religious Problems (Open Court 1988);
  • The Historical Evidence for Jesus (Prometheus 1988);
  • Who Was Jesus?: A Critique of the New Testament Record (Open Court 1989);
  • The Jesus Legend (Open Court 1996);
  • Can We Trust the New Testament? (Open Court 2003);
  • Belief and Make-Believe (Open Court 2003);
  • Cutting Jesus Down to Size (Open Court 2009).
  • Basic position: Casts doubt that there is contemporaneous evidence of Jesus's existence.
  • Views of others: Graham Stanton regards Well's arguments as the most sophisticated of the Christ myth theorists, though he rejects them. Michael Martin argues that Wells's arguments are sound though controversial.
Michael Martin (born 1932)
  • Relevant specialization: philosophy of religion
  • Relevant publications:
  • Atheism: A Philosophical Justification (Temple University Press 1989);
  • The Case Against Christianity (Temple University Press 1991);
  • Atheism, Morality, and Meaning (Prometheus 2002);
  • The Impossibility of God (ed, Prometheus 2003);
  • The Improbability of God (ed, Prometheus 2006);
  • The Cambridge Companion to Atheism (ed, Cambridge University Press 2006).
  • Basic position: Argues that a strong prima facie challenge can be made to the argument for Jesus's existence, though he acknowledges it as a minority position; argues that the position of G.A. Wells is solid.
  • Views of others:
Graham Stanton (1940-2009)
  • Relevant specialization: New Testament; Gospels, particularly Matthew's
  • Relevant publications:
  • Jesus of Nazareth in New Testament Preaching (Cambridge University Press 1974)
  • The Gospels and Jesus'' (Oxford University Press 1989)
  • Gospel for a New People: Studies in Matthew (T. & T. Clark Publishers 1992)
  • Gospel Truth? New Light on Jesus and the Gospels (Zondervan 1997)
  • Jesus and Gospel (Cambridge University Press 2004)
  • Basic position: Today nearly all historians accept that Jesus existed and that the gospels contain valuable evidence about him
  • Views of others: