Jump to content

Talk:Chakra (JScript engine)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AnOddName (talk | contribs) at 12:31, 10 April 2010 (moved Talk:Chakra (JavaScript engine) to Talk:Chakra (JScript engine): per description in article). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconComputing Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMicrosoft Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Microsoft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

rewrite

Is Chakra a completly rewrite of JScript, or is it only the interpreter? We should add the note about JScript in the article! mabdul 11:08, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Now that you mention, all the articles I encountered called Chakra a "JavaScript engine". But shouldn't we call it a "JScript engine", as JScript is MS' implementation of the ECMA standard? Then again, the two languages barely differ, so it's no wonder that the two terms are used interchangeably. Cheers, theFace 09:05, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I do think so... mabdul 10:26, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]