Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clear-flow

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Travis810 (talk | contribs) at 15:33, 8 April 2010 (Clear-flow). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Clear-flow (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-Notable company that fails WP:ORG Codf1977 (talk) 14:45, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have just edited this entry in order to make it more news worthy for interested parties regarding the improving economic status of Cornwall. Please let me know if you have any feedback or there are any other guidence notes which will help me make this satisfy all requirements. Travis810 (talk) 15:06, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The subject of the article needs to be notable and pass the notability guidelines for companies - The speedy delete was declined on the grounds of the news coverage of the funding from the ERDF, however this a single event and I can't find the significant coverage of Clear-flow elsewhere as per the notability guidelines. Codf1977 (talk) 15:15, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The coverage is certainly there in numerous publications and websites, businesscornwall.co.uk, convergencecornwall.com, southwestwater.co.uk, southwestbusiness.co.uk, in line with the way that the article has been changed to clearly define clear-flow as a company of note due to the investment that it is attracting, it certainly should be considered notable within the region and would further encourage growth and coverage of the region if included.

Travis810 (talk) 15:33, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]