Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mondrian programming language

Mondrian programming language

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable, searching for it returns essentially nothing, no coverage in notable sources, it doesn't even seem to be actively developed or even have a homepage anymore Tuxcantfly (talk) 20:49, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- no notability demonstrated in any source, and no sources to support the claims. N2e (talk) 22:44, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:56, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep You guys obviously didn't look very hard for links. But there they are now and they establish notability. Now someone just needs to incorporate them into the article. Silverseren^C 00:48, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Changing vote to Neutral Sorry, I missed those sources, though I still have yet to see any mention of non-trivial usage outside of academia. Nevertheless, the article really does need to be refined to emphasize on Mondrian's unique features; the "hello world" example does anything but that. Tuxcantfly (talk) 03:59, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's true, the article certainly needs some work, but we're not here for that, we're here to establish notability. Do the sources do that? Silverseren^C 04:03, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Sorry, but the cited sources do not cut it; all are self-published, or not independent, or do not give significant coverage; most miss the mark on all three counts (if they are about this language at all, and not about some other homonymous product). --Lambiam 23:16, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]