Template talk:Conference reference
Appearance
Documentation
Usage
Copy this blank version to use:
{{Conference reference | Author = | Year = | Month = | Title = Required | Booktitle = Required | Editor = | Others = | Edition = | Publisher = | Location = | Pages = | URL = | ID = }}
Description of parameters
- Author: Last name, First name.
- Date: January 1, 2006. Full date of publication.
- Year: Year of publication (ignored if the Date field is used).
- Month: Month of publication (ignored if the Date field is used, or if the Year field is not used).
- Year: Year of publication (ignored if the Date field is used).
- Title: Title of article. This is a required parameter.
- Booktitle: Title of Proceedings. This is a required parameter. eg: "Proceedings of the conference name, conference location, conference year held"
- Editor: No text is added, so labels such as "(ed.)" has to be supplied by user.
- Others: For uses such as "illustrated by Smith" or "trans. Smith".
- Edition: When the book has more than one edition. eg: "2nd edition".
- Pages: 1–2: first page, and optional last page (put an – for the range).
- Publisher: Publisher should not include corporate designation such is "Ltd" or "Inc".
- Location: Place of publication (and not conference place). Produces Location: Publisher (ignored if the Publisher field is not used).
- ID: Identifier such as ISBN 1-111-22222-9 or {{LCC|Z253.U69}} or {{ISSN|1111-2220}}
- URL: URL of the online article or proceedings.
See also
- Wikipedia:Cite sources: Style guide
- Wikipedia:Template messages/Sources of articles/Generic citations: Related templates
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikicite
Discussion
Editor field
is there a reason conference reference doesn't have an editor field? Is there a template that DOES do that (Book Article Reference perhaps)
I would be looking for author, title, editors, booktitle, year, ISBN, Pages
Or so I would think Rick Boatright 21:13, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Added "Editor", as well as other optional fields like in Template:Book reference. Of course, it's backward compatible with the old template (I have done a lot of testing, and after the changes old usages seems OK). --surueña 18:45, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
Does URL= do anything?
I tried using it in the reference in the RISC Single Chip article, but no link showed up - did I do something wrong, or is there a bug in the template? Guy Harris 05:41, 12 January 2006 (UTC)