User talk:WhatamIdoingg

{{adminhelp}}

I like to apologize for my stupidity of creating an account where I absolutely had no idea that Jessica was using the IP address. To prevent further confusion from innocent users, I suggest adding a banned tag for her. She is clearly much worst than a blocked user.

Put the banned tag on the sockmaster. She is clearly banned. Anyone can see that. Administrators like Bradeos Graphon and Dekimasu have reverted her edits without question. That is a characteristic of someone who is banned. See here: Wikipedia:Banning policy#Difference between bans and blocks. Someone who was blocked would not get that treatment. Please put the appropriate banned tag on her user page, please so innocent users like me will know of her ban. We should do whatever it takes to prevent innocent users from being a sock of Jessica. It's not fair that they don't know of her ban. It should be publicly revealed of her behaviors on Wikipedia:BU.

Here is the diff of where Bradeos Graphon is reverting all of her edits:

[1]

Here is the diff of where Dekimasu is reverting all of her edits: [2]

Starting from 05:24, 20 December 2007-05:35, 20 December 2007, Dekimasu reverts edits made from sockpuppet of banned user.

Jessica was editing during a time where being banned and being blocked was unclear. I think we should just say she is banned since the admins here that I pointed out have already treated her as a banned user. There is no reason for why she can't be placed on the Wikipedia:LOBU. The list is already violating Wikipedia:DENY so what's adding Jessica going to hurt? WhatamIdoingg (talk) 19:36, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why this is such a big deal requiring the {{adminhelp}} template. If someone's blocked then "innocent users like [you]" won't have to deal with her anyhow (not disregarding the difference between blocks and bans, but still). Innocent users don't suddenly become socks, you know. fetchcomms☛ 20:54, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm requesting an admin to add the banned tag to Jessica's user page and put her on the Wikipedia:LOBU. It would alert the public of her ban. In the end it would prevent innocent users from being blocked as her sock. WhatamIdoingg (talk) 20:57, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Innocent users that just happen to use the same IP address, eh? fetchcomms☛ 21:01, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Look at her SPI. That's another characteristic of banned users. Banned users usually have a SPI case in finding their reincarnations. Blocked users usually don't have that because they aren't as serious. WhatamIdoingg (talk) 21:04, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Since Wikipedians are fussy about accounts that behaved like the banned user, which in Jessica's case it seems they do care, this is my reason for her being listed on the Wikipedia:LOBU. WhatamIdoingg (talk) 21:26, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

←Mhm. fetchcomms☛ 01:02, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Does "Mhm" mean you agree with me? If you don't agree, then read below.

Fine, I don't even care for the next potential innocent user who gets caught as a sock of Jessica Liao. I hope they do because Wikipedia is corrupt for not telling innocent users about banned users. They publicly reveal sex offenders for a reason to protect children. If you won't publicly reveal banned users, then fine. I now know what Wikipedia is. It's a dog-eat-dog world that cares nothing about anyone. Have a nice day. I'm out of here. This is my last comment. WhatamIdoingg (talk) 01:42, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]