Wikipedia:Editor review/Fetchcomms
Fetchcomms (talk · contribs · count) I've been active for a short while, and I'm looking for a serious review—I want to get to know Wikipedia more comprehensively, I suppose. I'm part of WikiProject Missouri and work in Articles for creation as well. I'm not looking to be an admin—I have no need to the tools or the added workload, nor do I have enough experience. I don't know whether this will change later, although I can guarantee any RfA at all would be far into the future. fetchcomms☛ 01:20, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
Questions
- What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
- I'm not focusing on anything particular right now—I do NPP (not as often now), RCP (mostly on Huggle) and some content work. I have 11 DYKs and 1 GA, Clinton Presidential Center, which I think is what I've worked hardest on in the short time I've been active.
- Have you been in any disputes over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- I've been in a few minor conflicts, none of which I have much recollection of (because, well, they weren't very big). I don't really bother with arguing about pointless things, unless something is blatantly wrong. Several users have caused me my fair share of stress; sometimes I become rather frustrated that it's so hard for some to simply read a policy or something similar, although I don't recall ever having gotten overly mad about it. If I can solve something by discussing it on a talk page, I prefer to do so.
Reviews
Hi. I find no problems with your aricles excepts the paragraphs are too long, especially the lead sections. Maybe you could consider splitting them into smaller paragraphs. Kayau Voting IS evil 03:41, 21 February 2010 (UTC)